Beam stuck in a wall and free on one end with force ```Name: rodney b Status: N/A Age: N/A Location: N/A Country: N/A Date: Around 1995 ``` Question: In differential equations today, we discussed the equation of motion for a beam that was stuck in the wall on one end but let free to move on the other end. My professor was unable to explain where that equation came from so I was wondering if someone on this bbs here could. I would really appreciate it. If the explanation is too long or involved a book reference would be great too. Also I was wondering, if instead of using a general equation for describing the motion, if we used only a single force acting on it in the middle would that simplify the derivation? And also, would the greatest force upward be exerted to say a diver on a diving board when he is at the tip of the beam or in the middle. Is the answer to that question really all that obvious or is the equation governing the motion of that beam much more difficult if you vary the position of the downward force (in the diver example his position of n then board (g))? Replies: Well, you have quite a few questions there. The equation comes from continuum mechanics, which is the theory of how solid (in this case - it also does liquids) bodies behave mechanically. Ordinary mechanics treats how point particles (or at least infinitely rigid bodies) behave - for a point particle in 3 dimensions that gives 3 variables for dynamics to act on, for a rigid body the number of variables increases to at only 6. But for a real solid material, which can bend and stretch (called strain effects) under imposed forces (called stresses) you really have an infinite number of such variables (well actually something on the order of Avogadro's number) which is why a continuum description and differential equations are necessary. I am not too familiar with the literature, but try looking for "continuum mechanics" books for a derivation. This is also important for civil engineering, but I am not sure if they usually derive it in their texts or not - you could check a civil engineering textbook though. Limiting the imposed forces does not simply things because the problem is not the complexity of the forces, but the complexity of the body (with an infinite number of degrees of freedom) responding to the forces. asmith Click here to return to the Mathematics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (help@newton.dep.anl.gov), or at Argonne's Educational Programs