Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Bell's Inequality Theorem
Name: Unknown
Status: N/A
Age: N/A
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: Around 1993

I have a question about Bell's Inequality Theorem. He talks about measuring a pair of photon twins with polarization detectors. If both detectors are set 0 degrees the they will receive the same message. If one detector is turned 30 degrees it will be different, one out of four measurements. I agree up to here. But then he says if you turn the other detector 30 degrees the other way, the rate of differences will increase to 3 out of four (cos^2 (60)=3/4). I disagree because if we are measuring a SIGNAL, it is going to be sent Horizontally or Vertically for error free transmission at 0 degrees (H always equals 0, V always = 1). So with all V signals, turning one detector 30 degrees will give a 1 three out of four times. Turning the other detector 30 degrees the other way will still give 1 three out of four times. So they will both get the same (right or wrong) message 5 out of 8 times (9/16+1/16). NO VIOLATION of Bell's Theorem. If the photons are sent at random, though, the detectors will be different 3/4 of the time, but they should be. At 90 degree separation they are always different (opposite). Move one towards the other 30 degrees and it will be non-opposite ONE out of FOUR times. Non-locality is not proven (to me) as the messages at one detector do not depend on the setting of the other.

The 3/4 difference is a result of a quantum mechanical calculation of probabilities, not based on classical reasoning about signals that are horizontal or vertical. Maybe the author did not explain this properly, but that is the key difference of quantum mechanic; you cannot understand it by classical reasoning. The two photons are really coupled.

A. Smith

Click here to return to the Physics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory