Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Particle Theory (QED electrons)
Name: Unknown
Status: N/A
Age: N/A
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: Around 1993

I was wondering if anybody has come up with some proposed models for the electron that are renormalized and compatible with Quantum Electrodynamics. In QED, the electron can not be thought of as a spheroid with an evenly distributed charge because it should then repel and explode. According to the inverse square law, the formula for charge rests on the phrase 1/r. As it turns out when all is said and done, the QED electron model has no radius to boast, and an infinite energy. Also, is it possible that in same fashion a photon (being a boson) has no rest mass, an electron (being a fermion), has no , shall we say, "rest radius"? Note the difference in angular momentum in each family. Might this relate to the"hidden" information in each case (volume for the fermions and mass for the bosons)?

Basically the standard model regards all the elementary particles as point particles (i.e. with infinite energy in principle, if the electric field energy is really included). This is clearly unsatisfactory. Note that it does not have much to do with spin, though - for example a proton has spin 1/2, but it is a composite particle containing 3 quarks, and so the protons really does have a certain radius. But, electrons really do behave as point particles down to the length scales they have been tested on (fractions of the size of a proton, anyway, and orders of magnitude less than the "classical" radius of an electron in which its mass arises from its electrostatic energy). The string theories are intended as a way to depart from the pointparticle model, not that they do not have problems of their own. But some of them actually do end up getting rid of the infinities in QED - at least in principle. No one has actually gotten as far as deriving QED from string theory (at least that I am aware of) - but in principle the electron would then be modeled by these strings, with certain kinds of vibrations on the string. Of course, all sorts of other theories can be imagined - it is really an open question, but unfortunately one that no experiments are likely to address for many years.

A. Smith

Click here to return to the Physics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory