Ask A Scientist©

Environmental Science Archive


Trash

Author:     durwood
Text:       What is the most recent data on the average number of pounds of 
trash that people in Illinois produce? What is the composition of this 
rubbish? What is the truth about which products can and cannot be recycled? 
What number do they have to have in the recycling logo to be recycled?

Response #: 1 of 1
Author:     Eric Dallman
Text:       I actually had all this information you are interested in a 
"newsletter" from, I believe, November, 1992. Unfortunately I recycled it. I 
did ask for a reprint and hope to be able to address all 4 of your questions 
within the next few days. With regard to the numbers required to undergo 
recycling, I assume you refer to plastic. As far as what number does an item 
need to be recycled, the answer is that there is not really a requirement. I 
will attempt to describe a few of the reasons for recycling only certain 
plastics in certain communities. The real reason that only certain plastics 
are recycled in certain communities is not only the type of plastic, but also 
economics. Recyclers need to make money or they cannot survive. To make money
they have to have a large enough source of recyclable material to justify the 
cost of the recycling equipment, collection, etc. Recycling certain items just 
is not cost effective so no one bothers. With regard to plastic, the largest 
source of recyclable material is food product packaging, typically recycle 
codes 2 and 4. Even recycling companies that accept codes 2 and 4 usually only 
accept certain plastics based on what was in the container. A recycling 
company will not usually recycle a number 2 bleach bottle into a milk jug 
because either the bleach in the jug will have to be rinsed out or, more 
likely, some of the bleach will be present in the final recycled product and 
it will be worthless. Your first question on the average number of pounds of 
trash produced by Illinois residents has a rather shocking answer. My sources 
say that we produce about five pounds of trash per person per day. While this 
may not seem too extreme, consider that the people of India produce only 1/2 
pound of trash per person per day, 10 times less. To put trash production in 
perspective from a volume standpoint, every 10,000 people generate enough 
waste in a year to fill an acre ten feet deep. Assuming the population of 
Chicago is 3 million people, that means that approximately 300 acres of land 
are buried 10 feet deep each year (this from the city alone). Though I will 
continue to pursue the answers to the rest of your questions, I would like to 
refer you to another source of valuable information. Video programs are 
available from the U of I Film/Video Center based in Champaign-Urbana. There 
are many titles available and each item can be borrowed for a week at no cost 
(except return postage). This service is mainly intended for schools, 
government agencies, and citizen groups, but other organizations may ask to 
borrow films (I would not suggest that you try to borrow a film without going 
through your school). Call the film Video Center at 1-800-367-3456 and ask for 
a catalog. The film titled "The Garbage Explosion" (SW 58388) looks like it 
would be of interest to you. Since you appear to be interested in recycling I 
feel it is only fair that I give you my personal point of view on the subject. 
Recycling is far from the best way to reduce the amount of waste put into 
landfills. From a waste minimization standpoint, recycling should be 
considered as a last resort. That is not to say it is without merit. Recycling 
is very important because there are a lot of cases where it is the only waste 
minimization (WMin) option. However, from a global viewpoint recycling is not 
a method of pollution prevention, it is merely another means of waste 
management. Pollution prevention should really begin at the source. Recycling 
does not address source reduction. There is somewhat of a fine line (or more 
likely a difference of interpretation) between what constitutes prevention 
from "end-of-pipe" pollution control and waste management, including 
recycling. The Federal Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 provides a definition 
of what true prevention is. Recycling is not prevention, it is waste 
management. Recycling of materials requires the expenditure of energy and 
resources. These resources and energy can be saved if products are 
manufactured in such a way that they do not have to be recycled. To sum it up, 
there are really three means of pollution prevention: Source reduction 
(addressing the means of industrial production); Toxic substance use reduction 
(materials used); and "green" products. I have prepared a short summary of the 
benefits of all three which I hope you will find useful. Before I get to 
pollution prevention, let me finally answer your original question. I do not 
really have any Illinois trash data. I have been told that the Illinois EPA 
does not track this information (though the Illinois Dept. of Energy and 
Natural Resources might). Anyway, in July, 1992 the USEPA released a report on 
Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste. The report covered calendar year 
1990 and is the most recently published data (from the USEPA). Their report
puts the amount of trash produced per person per day at about 4.5 pounds. I 
broke the composition of the trash from the report into percentages and came 
up with the following: Paper, 35.5; Yard waste, 17.8; Metal, 8.9 Plastic, 8.9; 
Glass, 6.7; Wood, 6.7; Food, 6.7; Rubber and Leather, 2.2i Textiles, 2.2; and 
Other, 4.4. Though these percentages are derived from national rather than 
Illinois data, they are probably pretty close to the numbers you would find 
for Illinois. The report title is "Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste 
in the United States: 1992 Update." You can get a free copy of the report's 
executive summary by calling the RCRA Hotline at (800) 424-9346, or TDD (800) 
553-7672, for the hearing impaired. The entire report is rather long and 
available for a charge through the National Technical Information Service. 
Their number is (703) 486-3323.



Back to Environmental Topics Ask A Scientist Index
NEWTON Homepage Ask A Question

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators.
Argonne National Laboratory, Division of Educational Programs, Harold Myron, Ph.D., Division Director.