 |
Ask A Scientist©
Environmental Science Archive
|
 |
Trash
Author: durwood
Text: What is the most recent data on the average number of pounds of
trash that people in Illinois produce? What is the composition of this
rubbish? What is the truth about which products can and cannot be recycled?
What number do they have to have in the recycling logo to be recycled?
Response #: 1 of 1
Author: Eric Dallman
Text: I actually had all this information you are interested in a
"newsletter" from, I believe, November, 1992. Unfortunately I recycled it. I
did ask for a reprint and hope to be able to address all 4 of your questions
within the next few days. With regard to the numbers required to undergo
recycling, I assume you refer to plastic. As far as what number does an item
need to be recycled, the answer is that there is not really a requirement. I
will attempt to describe a few of the reasons for recycling only certain
plastics in certain communities. The real reason that only certain plastics
are recycled in certain communities is not only the type of plastic, but also
economics. Recyclers need to make money or they cannot survive. To make money
they have to have a large enough source of recyclable material to justify the
cost of the recycling equipment, collection, etc. Recycling certain items just
is not cost effective so no one bothers. With regard to plastic, the largest
source of recyclable material is food product packaging, typically recycle
codes 2 and 4. Even recycling companies that accept codes 2 and 4 usually only
accept certain plastics based on what was in the container. A recycling
company will not usually recycle a number 2 bleach bottle into a milk jug
because either the bleach in the jug will have to be rinsed out or, more
likely, some of the bleach will be present in the final recycled product and
it will be worthless. Your first question on the average number of pounds of
trash produced by Illinois residents has a rather shocking answer. My sources
say that we produce about five pounds of trash per person per day. While this
may not seem too extreme, consider that the people of India produce only 1/2
pound of trash per person per day, 10 times less. To put trash production in
perspective from a volume standpoint, every 10,000 people generate enough
waste in a year to fill an acre ten feet deep. Assuming the population of
Chicago is 3 million people, that means that approximately 300 acres of land
are buried 10 feet deep each year (this from the city alone). Though I will
continue to pursue the answers to the rest of your questions, I would like to
refer you to another source of valuable information. Video programs are
available from the U of I Film/Video Center based in Champaign-Urbana. There
are many titles available and each item can be borrowed for a week at no cost
(except return postage). This service is mainly intended for schools,
government agencies, and citizen groups, but other organizations may ask to
borrow films (I would not suggest that you try to borrow a film without going
through your school). Call the film Video Center at 1-800-367-3456 and ask for
a catalog. The film titled "The Garbage Explosion" (SW 58388) looks like it
would be of interest to you. Since you appear to be interested in recycling I
feel it is only fair that I give you my personal point of view on the subject.
Recycling is far from the best way to reduce the amount of waste put into
landfills. From a waste minimization standpoint, recycling should be
considered as a last resort. That is not to say it is without merit. Recycling
is very important because there are a lot of cases where it is the only waste
minimization (WMin) option. However, from a global viewpoint recycling is not
a method of pollution prevention, it is merely another means of waste
management. Pollution prevention should really begin at the source. Recycling
does not address source reduction. There is somewhat of a fine line (or more
likely a difference of interpretation) between what constitutes prevention
from "end-of-pipe" pollution control and waste management, including
recycling. The Federal Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 provides a definition
of what true prevention is. Recycling is not prevention, it is waste
management. Recycling of materials requires the expenditure of energy and
resources. These resources and energy can be saved if products are
manufactured in such a way that they do not have to be recycled. To sum it up,
there are really three means of pollution prevention: Source reduction
(addressing the means of industrial production); Toxic substance use reduction
(materials used); and "green" products. I have prepared a short summary of the
benefits of all three which I hope you will find useful. Before I get to
pollution prevention, let me finally answer your original question. I do not
really have any Illinois trash data. I have been told that the Illinois EPA
does not track this information (though the Illinois Dept. of Energy and
Natural Resources might). Anyway, in July, 1992 the USEPA released a report on
Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste. The report covered calendar year
1990 and is the most recently published data (from the USEPA). Their report
puts the amount of trash produced per person per day at about 4.5 pounds. I
broke the composition of the trash from the report into percentages and came
up with the following: Paper, 35.5; Yard waste, 17.8; Metal, 8.9 Plastic, 8.9;
Glass, 6.7; Wood, 6.7; Food, 6.7; Rubber and Leather, 2.2i Textiles, 2.2; and
Other, 4.4. Though these percentages are derived from national rather than
Illinois data, they are probably pretty close to the numbers you would find
for Illinois. The report title is "Characterization of Municipal Solid Waste
in the United States: 1992 Update." You can get a free copy of the report's
executive summary by calling the RCRA Hotline at (800) 424-9346, or TDD (800)
553-7672, for the hearing impaired. The entire report is rather long and
available for a charge through the National Technical Information Service.
Their number is (703) 486-3323.
NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators.
Argonne National Laboratory, Division of Educational Programs, Harold Myron, Ph.D., Division Director.