 |
Ask A Scientist©
Biology Archive
|
 |
Scientific laws
Author: scollins
Text: I need good definitions for the following terms: hypothesis,
theory, law. I teach high school biology and our textbook states that
scientific laws - universal explanations of phenomena - do not exist in
biology. This leads to the inevitable student comment that everything I have
taught them is "just a theory."
Response #: 1 of 1
Author: moodywj
Text: A hypothesis is a formal generalization, or tentative explanation
for a set of data, or a group of observations. A hypothesis allows scientists
to design specific, do able experiments to test whether the tentative
explanation will work on a new set of observations on the same subject. A
theory is a hypothesis that has been extensively tested to the point of being
generally accepted as true. Sometimes we use the term "law" for a very
extensively tested theory, especially one that has an equation, or
quantitative rule used to predict the outcome in a certain situation, e.g.,
the Law of Gravity. It is a common error to assume that when a scientist uses
the term "theory" that he or she means something which is still not yet
believed or accepted. This is not true. The word is used for almost all
principles because we do not really understand anything completely. We speak
of the theory of evolution, for example, even though virtually every reputable
biologist in the world believes that evolution is a proven law. However, some
very important details are still being debated and tested, so the word theory
is used. Scientists are always testing.
NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators.
Argonne National Laboratory, Division of Educational Programs, Harold Myron, Ph.D., Division Director.