Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Pregnancy and the Moon
Name:  Paul
Status:  other
Age:  20s
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: 2000-2001

Can the moon affect a woman's pregnancy?

There is some evidence that the lunar cycle affects human behavior so it would not be a stretch to posit some effect on pregnancy... to what extent I do not know.


All you have to do is to discuss this topic with a OB doctor or nurse and they will respond very quickly in the affirmative when it comes to delivery. The busiest time for pregnancy termination is clearly more frequently around a full moon. Whether this is due to a physical or mental factor has yet to be determined.


Up-date: July 2008

There is no scientific evidence of the moon's phase affecting the timing of birth, or conception, or any other aspect of pregnancy. We can look at this from several angles.

First, asking an OB nurse is not a reliable method to arrive at the answer. There is the problem of "confirmation bias", which is to say you're less likely to notice pregnant mothers when the moon is *not* full if you already suspect there is some correlation (in a similar manner, if you buy a certain car, you are much more likely to notice other people driving that same model). Next, according to Dr. Michelle Hakakha, M.D., there may indeed be more pregnant mothers admitted and presenting contractions during full moons, but they don't end up *delivering*. She denies any increased deliveries during a FM.

Second, many authoritative sources, such as Harvard Health Publications state that the moon-pregnancy link is a myth.

Third, in 1985, Rotton and Kelly did a meta-study of 37 other studies on the moon's effect on crime, psychiatric admissions, etc., and found no more than .03 % correlation, which is essentially zero (less than the background variation).

Fourth, and most importantly, there are several persistent misunderstandings about the moon's effect on tides and other bodies...

A.) The moon has no preferential attraction to water. The fact that we are made largely of water is irrelevant.

B.) The moon only affects the ocean tides because of the differential distance between two sides of the earth. The moon pulls more strongly on the near side of the earth because it is measurably closer. This effect becomes essentially zero for bodies as small as ours. To demonstrate this, you might ask yourself why you don't see tides going up and down in very large lakes.

Lastly, there is a constellation of beliefs involving women's reproduction system and the moon. This is partly fueled by the observation that a woman's menstrual cycle averages 28 days (although it can vary widely) and the moon's cycle is 29.5 days, which is another example of confirmation bias (the cycle does *not* sync with the sun or other planets or seasons, sunspot activity, etc., but no one notices that). This similarity is probably just coincidence, because in nature we find all sorts of days in a menstrual cycle that most people don't notice: opossum = 28, guinea pig = 11, sheep = 16, sows = 21, macaque monkeys = 25, chimpanzees = 37, rats and mice = about 5.

Paul Bridges

Click here to return to the Zoology Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory