I am a junior at East Pennsboro Area High School, in
Enola PA.(near Harrisburg). I am doing an independant science experiment,
in which I hope to test how various golf balls produce drag when placed
in a wind tunnel, because of varied surface areas produced by the varied
dimple patterns. Someone at Titleist told me that my experiment may not
be possible, and I am looking for any information possible.
Of course it's possible. But maybe not with the instruments you
have available. I mean, think about it. Suppose you test Titleist
balls and Brand X balls, and find Titleist balls are measurably slower
with your high-school instruments. Won't Titleist feel stupid? Here
they are, multimillion dollar company with instruments far more
expensive, sensitive and sophisticated than you can afford, months and
years to spend on the project which you don't have, and they neglected
to do your simple experiment comparing their balls to Brand X
balls. . .
Ah, I don't think so. We can probably count on the golf ball
manufacturers to be nonidiots, and so expect every successful golf
ball sold to have the best pattern anybody's ever discovered. We
expect the remaining differences to be very small, practically
unmeasurable by very careful professional measurements.
Of course, our inference could be wrong. So you might go for it
anyway, just to see if somebody HAS been dumb.
But perhaps you should include a few other objects with your golf
balls, so in case the golf balls all come out the same you can at
least say why golf balls are round instead of cubical, or why they are
dimpled instead of smooth.
You need to get a reference book on aerodynamic drag at low Mach
numbers, and investigate the role of boundary layer separation. A
university with an engineering school will have a library with books
like this in it, but you might try the encyclopaedia first to nail
down some basic concepts and vocabulary.
Click here to return to the Physics Archives
Update: June 2012