Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Electron Retracing Orbit
Name: Jonathan
Status: student
Age: N/A
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: N/A

Will an electron, in an orbit with other electrons, ever travel along the same path twice or will it travel in a chaotic path which will eventually cross every single point in that orbit without ever travelling along that identical path?

The flippant answer is "none of the above". It is not incorrect to think of electrons in atomic or molecular orbitals as planets orbiting the Sun. Electrons obey quantum mechanics, while planets obey Newtonian (classical) mechanics [more or less because frequently simplifying assumptions are made about ignoring the gravitational effects of all the other planets. The two are very different.

Electrons behave more like waves when confined to stable atomic/molecular states, but even this picture is incomplete, because the "waves" are not like throwing pebbles in a pond. Quantum mechanics only allows us to compute the "probability" that an electron will be at a point in space, and it really is not a "point" in the Euclidean sense, because the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle limits how accurately we can locate the electron's position and its momentum (mass x velocity). It even gets less intuitive. The position and motion probability is governed by a function that depends upon several numbers, called quantum numbers (n, l, m, s). Pauli showed that no two electrons could have the same exact set of these quantum numbers, so in a sense, the avoid one another.

All of this is very counter-intuitive, but so far as we know, one has to toss your intuition out the window (or at least re-train it) in order to correctly describe the behavior of atoms and molecules. Rather one has to let the math take us to the result that is consistent with the experimental data. And this very counter-intuitive package is the best we have to date, after a century of development.

If you feel uneasy about all this you are in good company. Einstein never really bought into quantum mechanics, saying famously, "God Does Not Roll Dice." And physicist Richard Feynman said words to the effect: Anyone who tells you that they understand quantum mechanics, does not understand the problem.

It is really tough to toss out our intuition and rely on the "long mathy equations" but that seems to be our only option at the present time.

Vince Calder

Dear Jonathan,

As we now know from our understanding of quantum mechanics, an electron is not a point, but is described by a wave. It is therefore spread over a region.

For example, an electron in the lowest Bohr orbit of a hydrogen atom is equally likely to be at any point around the orbit and at a range of radii. So at any instant it has some probability, given by its wave function, of being any place on any of its possible orbits.

To get a fuller understanding, read any elementary text which talks about quantum mechanics. Not knowing your grade, its hard to make a specific recommendation.

Best, Dick Plano, Professor of Physics emeritus, Rutgers University

Click here to return to the Physics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory