Country: United States
Date: March 2005
My students would like to know why the two new cells are
named "daughter cells". Did a scientist give them this name? Was it a
random choice? We know that the cells represent a duplication of the DNA
in mitosis. They could have been named "son cells" (says one young man).
I can't say exactly where this convention originated either, but I
was thinking that it might be because they're the result of asexual
binary fission. Although it is asexual by definition, if the parental
cell is considered to be the "mother" cell, then the progeny would
theoretically have to be of the same "gender", i.e. "female
daugthers", since their genetic material is essentially identical.
However, I've discovered that the decay particles from radioactive
elements are also eferred to as "daughters" of the "parental"
radioisotope, & I don't believe that any ender-based rationale could
possibly be ascribed to that situation.
So I've come to agree w/ Dr. Baker's previous suggestion that "it was
probably arbitrary like referring to ships as female", although I
won't tell if anyone wants to try spreading the rumor that it's due to
the "mother-daughter" relationship that I suggested....
Thanks for the interesting question,
Jeff Buzby, Ph.D.
CHOC Research Institute
Click here to return to the Molecular Biology Archives
Update: June 2012