Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne 45 Degrees Does Not Halve Gravitational Field Intensity
Name: Kyler
Status: student
Grade: 9-12
Location: AZ
Country: USA
Date: N/A 


Question:
If you were to take a long ramp, about 30 feet long, angle it at a 45 degrees angle to make a right triangle with 45, 45, and 90 degree angles, and roll the ball down it, would it have half the acceleration of a ball free falling at an initial rate of 9.8 meters per second per second?



Replies:
Hi Kyler

I presume your configuration would be similar to an object on a ramp such that the ramp is elevated at an angle of 45 degrees from the horizon. In this case, the acceleration of the ball would be 0.707 times 9.8 m/s/s. The reason is that the component of acceleration pointing down the ramp comes from the straight down acceleration (9.8 m/s/s) multiplied by the sine of the angle above the horizon. In the limit when the ramp is at 90 degrees to the horizon (straight up and down), the acceleration of the ball is the full 9.8 m/s/s. When the angle is zero, the acceleration is zero. To get half the acceleration due to gravity, the angle should be 30 degrees, as sin(30) is 0.5. The length of the ramp does not come into play here. Also please note that we are assuming that the ball has negligible rotational inertia, which will further decrease the acceleration down the ramp.

Hope this helps.

Bob Froehlich


The ball would have an acceleration of (9.8 m/s^2)*sin(45 deg.) = 6.93 m/s^2 parallel to the ramp. The vertical component of its acceleration would be sin(45 deg.) of this, which would be half of 9.8 m/s^2.

--
Tim Mooney


No, because some of the energy gained by the ball rolling down must go into spinning the ball (rotational inertia). That's why all the problems in your Physics book talk about blocks sliding down inclined planes. Sliding blocks don't spin so the problem of rotational inertia is neatly avoided.

R. W. "Bob" Avakian
Instructor
B.S. Earth Sciences; M.S. Geophysics
Oklahoma State Univ. Inst. of Technology


Kyler,

It would have less acceleration, but not necessarily half. That would depend on whether the ball were solid or hollow. It would depend on what is called the moment of inertia, or rotational inertia, of the ball. A hollow ball of mass M and radius R resists rotation more than a solid ball of the same mass and size. A very light ball with a great deal of mass at the ball's center would have free fall acceleration divided by the square root of two. Whenever dealing with an object that is rotating, structure of the object becomes important.

Dr. Ken Mellendorf
Physics Instructor
Illinois Central College



Click here to return to the Mathematics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (help@newton.dep.anl.gov), or at Argonne's Educational Programs

NEWTON AND ASK A SCIENTIST
Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory