Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne New Data Causing Revisions
Name: Chantel
Status: student
Grade: 9-12
Location: OH
Country: USA
Date: January 2009

How can new scientific data cause any existing scientific explanation to be supported, revised, or rejected?

All scientific model (also called "theories", but that is a term that carries a lot of baggage with it) must be, to use the common term "falsifiable". That means that the model must be able to be shown to be false, or incomplete. That is the difference between a scientific theory and a "dogma". The scientific theory is malleable, that is it is subject to change in the light of experimental data (which also may have its own limitations). On the other hand "dogma" is a "top -- down" proposition. This pronouncement, whatever it is, is "true" no matter how absurd it might appear. Then investigators are faced with the problem of making any and all experimental observations "fit" the immutable dogma. That scenario falls in the domain of philosophy or religion, not science. So no existing scientific explanation is ever total and complete. For those positions one must look into fields of religion or philosophy -- but do not call it science.

Vince Calder

The main way scientists communicate their findings is through scientific journal articles. Researchers publish experiments, data, results, and conclusions. Their goal is to come up with a way to explain their data or findings. Other researchers can read the articles and decide if their data fit the published work -- and then plan new experiments to confirm or refute previous findings.

One scientist might only run experiments in a range of conditions, and those conditions may differ from another scientist. One vital task of science is to take the combined "quilt" of different scientists' work and find an overall explanation that explains all the data, not just one specific area.

Scientists can also gather at conferences to present new findings and discuss them in person. Researchers who disagree about the data might gather and discuss their views at a conference, and come up with a comprehensive explanation together.

Once a consistent explanation is found, a scientist might come back later and summarize all the data in a 'review' article. This article explains the overall findings in a given field, and is usually written a few years after the original disagreement.

Hope this helps,

Burr Zimmerman

Click here to return to the General Topics Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory