Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Strength of Plastic Bottles
Name: Marcus
Status: Student
Grade: 4-5
Location: FL
Country: United States
Date: Fall 2009

I am doing a science investigation about the strength of plastic water bottles. I have noticed that some water bottles are thinner and do not seem to be as strong as they used to be. Are there any advantages for water bottles to be made stronger (or weaker)?

Well, the obvious advantage to making them weaker is that manufacturers can use less material, which makes them less expensive.It also would make them slightly lighter, which reduces transportation costs.

Richard Barrans
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Wyoming

There are many factors that go into the design of a bottle (water or otherwise). Some of the issues are: The wall thickness is important, as you have already discovered. But there are other factors.

What environment is the bottle going to be exposed? If it softens at elevated temperatures, that may eliminate a particular bottle. What is the internal pressure to which the bottle will be exposed? Carbonated sodas that may be used in the bottle, even if that was not the intended use, has to be taken into account.

Your observation that thin-walled bottles are weaker than thicker-walled bottles, is exactly what is to be expected.

On the other side, the thinner the bottle walls, the less material is used to construct the bottle. That makes it less expensive to manufacture. This is more complicated than just the cost of material. Those bottles have to be transported. So the "net" weight versus the "gross" weight is important. The greater the "net" weight, the more product that is shipped compared to a high "gross" weight".

Even more subtle, if you deliver a water bottle that holds 1 gallon (8.3 pounds), no one who is going on a hike is going to want to carry that extra baggage. Also if you are going to be exposed to below freezing temperatures, the bottle may fracture and the water (ice) is lost. So there are many factors that come into considering the construction of a beverage bottle.

Vince Calder

Hi Marcus,

A water bottle must be strong enough to hold water and not break -- even when handled roughly or dropped. Companies work hard to determine what is "strong enough", and have many tests and requirements.

If the water bottle is "strong enough", then the next goal is to make it lighter. The material it is made out of is expensive, and companies try to make the bottles lighter (use less material) to save money.

Using less material also means less energy used and less trash created, which is good for the environment.

Hope this helps,
Burr Zimmerman

Hi Marcus,

Actually, the plastic used for all disposable water bottles is the same, namely food-grade (very pure) polyester terephthalate. The differences you are seeing are only because some bottles are thicker than others. The reason for the thinner bottles is simply to use less plastic, so there is less material waste if the bottle is thrown away, and to make the bottle cheaper to make. The thinner bottles are weaker, simply because they are thinner to save plastic, not because the plastic is any different. They are weaker, but still strong enough to do the job they are intended to do.


Bob Wilson

Click here to return to the Engineering Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory