Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Efficient Engine
Name: N/A
Status: Student
Age: 40s
Location: N/A
Country: N/A
Date: N/A

Is it not possible that an engine could be produced that would use water as a fuel source and produce no pollutants. Take water run electricity(research for the quantity that varrying voltages/amperages produced(add plenty of electrolytes, salt being an example). Then produce an engine that has a hydrogen production section that only seperates enough hydrogen/oxygen to fuel combustion at that time. Time it so that with the amount of electrical current applied seperates the hydrogen and oxygen at a given rate.

A High heat spark is needed to spark the flame say oh 570 degrees C. A combustion happens the pistons move due to the expanding of the gasses. Some of the Hydrogen and water reform to water. This can of course be reused if you want. Naturally you want this hydrogen to be produced in the best manner say with the aid of geothermal help or solar. The process has to be refined for efficiency but it should work am i right.

If I understand your idea, you want to separate hydrogen from oxygen, and use the energy released when they recombine. You realize, of course, that the amount of energy required to separate hydrogen from oxygen is exactly the same as the amount of energy released when they recombine, so water is not actually being used as a fuel source in this case, but rather as an energy-storage medium.

Tim Mooney

You want to use electricity to split water into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas, and then recombine these gases in an engine to re-form the water and generate heat. The first problem you will run into here is conservation of energy. If it takes X joules of energy to split the water into H2 and O2, then the most energy you can get back out of the H2 and O2 when you recombine them in an engine is X Joules. Let's say that you want to divert Y Joules of heat energy from the engine to make the car go; then you'll only have X minus Y Joules left to split the exhaust water back into H2 and O2. You won't have enough energy to split all the water, and in the next cycle you'll be able to split even less. Before long, you'll have plenty of water, but no energy left to split it with.

The second problem you'll run into is that the first scenario is overly optimistic. It assumes that when you change forms of energy (chemical energy in water, electrical energy, kinetic energy of the car), you don't lose any of it. Strictly speaking, by the law of conservation of energy, you don't, but it won't be in forms you can use. Any time you convert energy from one form to another, a lot of it just goes away as unrecoverable heat. This is a big effect, too. When electricity is generated by heat engines (such as coal-fired turbines in a power plant), less than 30% of the energy released by the combustion actually becomes electrical energy. When heat engines are used to generate mechanical energy, the best they can do is to convert about 40% of the combustion energy into mechanical work. Batteries are horridly inefficient. Fuel cells are more efficient, but there will still be substantial energy losses in each conversion. So, your scheme wouldn't get through many cycles even if you didn't try to power the car with it.

Basically, you are proposing a perpetual motion machine. You hope to continuously extract energy from water without depleting it. Such a scenario sounds too good to be true, and it is, indeed, not true. To think through if any perpetual motion machine will work, you need to pay attention to the energy requirements in every step of the cycle. Inevitably, any energy you can extract in one stage of the cycle you will have to pay back, with interest, to complete another stage of the cycle.

Richard Barrans Jr., Ph.D.

Click here to return to the Engineering Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (, or at Argonne's Educational Programs

Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory