Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Infrared
Name: Grace Y.
Location: Outside U.S.
Date: Winter 2009-2010
Hello, I would like to know (on a molecular level) why
methane absorbs infrared better than carbon dioxide. Does it have
something to do with the characteristic of the vibrational modes of
methane? If so, what is it? Thank-you for your time! Grace
A number of factors come into play.
First, of course, is the amount of gas present. I will ignore that
because your question is not about that.
Second, the next question is how a molecular species interacts with
electromagnetic radiation. Because neither CO2 nor CH4 has a permanent
dipole moment, that is they are symmetric, they do not interact with
Third, CO2 has 3 vibrations: a symmetric stretch, an asymmetric
stretch, and a doubly degenerate bending mode -- up and down, in and out.
The symmetric stretch (1354 cm^-1) does not interact with electromagnetic
radiation. That leaves the asymmetric stretch ( 2396 cm^-1) and the two
degenerate bending vibrations (673 cm^-1).
Fourth, while methane CH4 has more atoms than CO2, the arrangement of
the atoms is highly symmetric. Only two vibrational modes absorb infrared
radiation -- the ones where both the hydrogens and the carbon atom move.
Those are the vibrations that present an oscillation of the dipole moment.
Fifth, things get even trickier because how much infrared radiation
absorbed, or emitted, depends upon how easy it is to get the atoms to move,
and what is their "inherent" mobility.
All of these factors come into play and it is difficult to attribute the
absorption to any one of these factors.
Click here to return to the Chemistry Archives
Update: June 2012