Department of Energy Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science NEWTON's Homepage NEWTON's Homepage
NEWTON, Ask A Scientist!
NEWTON Home Page NEWTON Teachers Visit Our Archives Ask A Question How To Ask A Question Question of the Week Our Expert Scientists Volunteer at NEWTON! Frequently Asked Questions Referencing NEWTON About NEWTON About Ask A Scientist Education At Argonne Pure Water as Electrolyte
Name: Karen
Status: educator
Grade: 9-12
Location: TN
Country: USA
Date: Fall 2009


Question:
Is pure water a weak electrolyte or a nonelectrolyte?



Replies:
Karen,

Pure water (100.000% H2O) is a non-conductor. You may want to demonstrate that water is composed of two elements, gaseous Hydrogen and gaseous Oxygen. You can do this demonstration by sending an electric current through the water -- electrolysis. If you use pure water the reaction will be really slow. However, if you add several drops of sulfuric acid to the water the reaction bubbles right along. Why? Because the sulfuric acid breaks into ions (H+, HSO4- and SO42-) ions. The ions will conduct the electricity to break down the water.

Warren Young


Karen,

Strictly speaking the term electrolyte applies to substances dissolved in water and whether the addition of these substances to water allows the solution to be a good or poor conductor of electricity. So, technically, the term should not apply to water itself.

On the other hand, if we take the broad definition of an electrolyte as something that is a good conductor of electricity, then we can say that water is nonelectrolyte since pure water does not contain enough ions to allow for good electrical conductance.

Greg (Roberto Gregorius)
Canisius College


Pure water does not conduct electricity. A dissolved ion must be present in order to make it an electrolyte solution.

It is difficult, however, to produce water that is so pure that it will not conduct a charge. Tap water and other ordinary water sources frequently contain sufficient dissolved materials that they will conduct a small electrical charge.

Ian Farrell


I have not heard it discussed, but I would think it was a weak electrolyte. Maybe a "VERY weak" electrolyte. The resistivity of pure water is roughly 18 meg-ohm.cm at room temperature. If you had a plastic tube 1cm inside diameter, and 1 cm long, with good electrodes at both ends, the resistance between them would be 18 megohms.

That is enough conductivity to grow a medium-thin anodic oxide on aluminum if 100vdc was applied between two electrodes for a long time, like a week. The conductivity is ionic; the charge-carriers are H+ ions and OH- ions. All electrolytes have ions of both polarities, just like that.

That is also enough conductivity to dissipate static charges or communicate chemically-caused voltages to electrodes. Such as neural impulses, ECG's & EEG's. Pure water does it, but does not do as good a job for small signals as stronger electrolytes because almost all metal electrodes will either:

a) react with water, making metal and OH- ions, making a stronger electrolyte, then it is not "pure water"; or,

b) develop dipole layers in the water adjacent to the metal, which are more insulating than the bulk of the water. Then the measuring instrument might actually have difficulty getting onto its wire the exact same voltage that exists in the water nearby.

c) grow solid (precipitated) oxides or hydroxides on the metal, which are also more insulating than the water itself.

There are usually some electrochemical noise sources on every electrode, that need to be shorted out to allow the weak signal voltages to show clearly. A strong electrolyte usually does that better.

A good electrode assembly tends to need strong electrolyte inside, next to the metal. Then it is connected to the weak electrolyte under test by a very narrow salt bridge, that lets just enough ionic conductivity happen for the meter, but slows down contamination of the weak by the strong as much as can be gotten away with. It is a theoretical issue in every practical situation: can your solution be allowed this amount of contamination? Even the best pH probes will contaminate your best de-ionized water if left soaking in it a long time. You might find that overnight the resistivity has gone down from 18M-Ohm.cm to 10 or 1 M-Ohm.cm. So electrode assemblies are only used in temporary-exposure modes: either the electrode is used then removed, or the solution is large and/or flowing or otherwise renewed continuously.

I hope you were not asking with a different definition of :"electrolyte" in mind. The physicists' definition would be the bipolar ionic conductivity.

Y'know, one electron stuck in a non-electrolyte like propane liquid would probably be considered a static charge. It could migrate by convection, or by its host molecule being dragged through the fluid by the electric-field, which would be called "drift", or maybe even by hopping from molecule to molecule. The difference in an electrolyte is that the number of mobile-charges present greatly outnumbers the number of charges you would imagine travelling between electrodes. So one charge entering the liquid then travels as a million charges in parallel, each travelling one-millionth of the distance between electrodes. Then, voila, one charge pops out onto the other electrode, and nobody has travelled very far at all. I am sure this greater number business is true for pure water.

Jim Swenson


Oops! Another case of type casting. An electrolyte is a substance (solid, liquid, gas) that will conduct electricity, that is, allow electrons to flow. Nothing, not even a vacuum, is a nonelectrolyte, if the applied voltage is large enough. We put substances into electrolyte/non-electrolyte "boxes" which should be labeled "more or less". Pure water (which is very difficult to prepare, by the way) has a concentration of 10^-7 mols/liter of H[+] and OH[-] each. Now that is not very much, but it is not zero. In contrast, add a bit of salt and the conductivity, a measure of "electrolyte-ness", is very large and one would classify that solution as an electrolyte.

We have to be careful when we put things into categories. We should add the caveat "more or less" or "approximately". Too often the categories themselves get a "life" of their own and the classifications becomes absolute, and become more important than the data they are intended to classify and organize.

Vince Calder



Click here to return to the Chemistry Archives

NEWTON is an electronic community for Science, Math, and Computer Science K-12 Educators, sponsored and operated by Argonne National Laboratory's Educational Programs, Andrew Skipor, Ph.D., Head of Educational Programs.

For assistance with NEWTON contact a System Operator (help@newton.dep.anl.gov), or at Argonne's Educational Programs

NEWTON AND ASK A SCIENTIST
Educational Programs
Building 360
9700 S. Cass Ave.
Argonne, Illinois
60439-4845, USA
Update: June 2012
Weclome To Newton

Argonne National Laboratory